CVE Feed

SAP Approuter does not sufficiently validate certain incoming requests before forwarding them to backend destinations. Due to the complexity of the required conditions, an attacker with low privileges could send specially crafted requests to bypass authorization checks and reach protected resources beyond their assigned scope. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to read sensitive data and perform limited modifications on protected resources, resulting in a high impact on confidentiality and a low impact on integrity. There is no impact on availability.

SAP Approuter does not consistently enforce integrity verification on certain session-related request headers under specific conditions. An attacker with low privileges could send a specially crafted request that bypasses the integrity check and loads another user's session context. Successful exploitation requires the attacker to have previously observed matching session values out-of-band, which makes the attack complex to execute. This could result in a high impact on confidentiality and a low impact on integrity. There is no impact on availability.

SAP Approuter does not enforce cross-site request forgery protection on the authentication flow by default. An unauthenticated attacker could craft a malicious link and trick a victim into following it. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to bind the victim's session to an attacker-controlled identity, resulting in a low impact on integrity. There is no impact on confidentiality and availability.

SAP Approuter does not consistently handle certain error conditions. An attacker with low privileges could exploit this under a non-default configuration. Successful exploitation is highly complex, as it depends on conditions outside the attacker's control. This could result in a low impact on availability. There is no impact on confidentiality and integrity.

A malicious or compromised OData service could disclose sensitive authentication information and inject untrusted data into the application, which may leads to a high impact on confidentiality and low impact on integrity and no impact on Availability.

SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform (Admin Tools) does not perform sufficient authorization check on certain administrative functionality. An attacker authenticated as a non-administrative user could bypass this restriction to gain limited information about affected functionality. This results in a low impact on confidentiality. There is no impact on integrity and availability.

SAPUI5 allows a key user with content adaptation privileges to inject malicious script content into persisted application changes. When another user subsequently opens the adapted application, the injected script executes in the victim's browser session. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to access sensitive session data and perform unauthorized actions on behalf of the victim, resulting in a high impact on confidentiality and integrity. There is no impact on availability.

Due to an SQL Injection vulnerability in SAP Social intelligence, an authenticated attacker could directly inject an SQL DDL (Data Definition Language) string into the underlying database without further authorization. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to make malicious changes to the database structure, resulting in a low impact to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the system.

Reprocess Bank Statement Items in SAP S/4HANA does not perform the necessary authorization checks for authenticated users, allowing them to use rules that have not been shared with them, resulting in privilege escalation.This vulnerability has a low impact on confidentiality, with no impact on integrity and availability of the application

SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform stores certain sensitive credentials associated with user objects using a hard-coded cryptographic key. An attacker with high privileges and local access to the server could retrieve these objects and decrypt the stored credentials. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to obtain sensitive authentication data and modify protected information, resulting in a high impact on confidentiality and integrity. There is no impact on availability.

SAP Approuter does not enforce sufficient flow control in certain functionality. An attacker with low privileges could send high volumes of data without consuming responses, causing unbounded memory growth. This results in a low impact on availability. There is no impact on confidentiality and integrity.

SAP Approuter does not correctly validate client certificates in certain callback flows. An attacker with low privileges, holding a certificate from the same trusted authority with matching subject values, could bypass the identity check. This complexity makes the attack difficult to execute. Successful exploitation could allow impersonation of a trusted internal component, resulting in a high impact on integrity and a low impact on confidentiality and availability.

SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform (Web Intelligence) allows a low-privileged attacker to upload a specially crafted spreadsheet file containing malicious external references. When the file is processed as a data source, the affected component resolves these references and exposes the contents of sensitive server-side files within the resulting report. This results in a high impact on confidentiality, with no impact on integrity and availability.

SAP ABAP Platform allows an unauthenticated user to send a specially crafted request to an internal component. This could disclose limited, non-sensitive data from previously used memory, leading to a low on confidentiality, with no impact on integrity and availability of the application.

SAP Advanced Planning and Optimization (Model Mix Planning) contains a hardcoded credential within the source code of the application to perform authorization check to access certain functionalities in the application. An attacker with high privileges could leverage this hardcoded credential to bypass authorization and delete specific planning-related restrictions in the application. Successful exploitation could result in a low impact on confidentiality and integrity, with no impact on availability of the application.

SAP Manufacturing Integration and Intelligence (MII) does not perform necessary authorization check on certain application function, allowing a low-privileged authenticated attacker to access information that should be restricted to privileged users. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to access the users account information in the application, which could be leveraged to facilitate further attacks against the identified user accounts. This vulnerability results in low impact on confidentiality of the data, with no impact on the integrity and availability

SAP NetWeaver and ABAP Platform (Change and Transport System - Customer Transport Integration Wizard) allows a low-privileged user to modify configuration tables that control access to data objects during specific operations. These unauthorized modifications could result in processing delays and operational disruption, leading to a low impact on the integrity and availability of the application with no impact on confidentiality.

SAP Approuter does not sufficiently validate tenant context in inbound requests. An unauthenticated attacker could send specially crafted requests to spoof the tenant context under conditions not fully within their control. Successful exploitation could allow limited access to another tenant's information, resulting in a low impact on confidentiality. There is no impact on integrity and availability.

SAP Approuter does not sufficiently handle certain requests under specific conditions. An unauthenticated attacker could send specially crafted input that causes the component to crash and restart. Successful exploitation requires specific runtime conditions to be met, making the attack complex to execute. This results in a high impact on availability. There is no impact on confidentiality and integrity.

WebSocket of SAP Approuter does not perform sufficient authorization checks in certain functionality. An attacker with low privileges could exploit this to access restricted functionality. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to read sensitive information and perform limited modifications, resulting in a high impact on confidentiality and a low impact on integrity. There is no impact on availability.

SAP NetWeaver Application Server ABAP and ABAP Platform allow an attacker with high privileges to bypass missing security controls on an internal code path leading to operating system command execution. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to execute OS-level commands that write to the operating system or stop the SAP system, resulting in no impact on confidentiality, low impact on integrity, and high impact on availability.

SAP NetWeaver Application Server Java (Adobe Document Service) uses outdated open source cryptographic and data transfer libraries that contain known vulnerabilities addressed in later versions. A low-privileged authenticated attacker could potentially leverage these weaknesses against the affected component, though no specific exploit is currently known. Successful exploitation could result in low impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the system.

SAP Approuter does not sufficiently validate certain token content under specific configurations. An unauthenticated attacker could send a specially crafted token to cause sensitive credential material to be sent to an attacker-controlled destination. The attack complexity is high due to non-default preconditions required in the target environment. This results in a high impact on confidentiality and a low impact on integrity and availability.

Due to a Missing Authorization Check vulnerability in SAP Manufacturing Integration and Intelligence, an unauthenticated remote attacker could access scheduling-related application functions without proper authorization validation. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to retrieve, create, modify, or delete application-managed scheduling data, causing a low impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Due to a Missing Authorization Check vulnerability in SAP Manufacturing Integration and Intelligence, an unauthenticated attacker could send crafted requests to the Cost Servlet using specific parameter values. If processed by the application, these requests enable access to backend operations. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to read, create, modify, or delete application-managed business data, resulting in a limited impact on the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected system.

SAP Manufacturing Integration and Intelligence allows a privileged attacker to exploit insufficient file path validation in certain functions using specially crafted input. Exploitation also requires a legitimate user to subsequently access the attacker-influenced content and depends on conditions outside the attacker�s control. Successful exploitation could allow files to be written outside the intended directory and affect other components, resulting in a high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

SAP Data Services Management Console allows an overly permissive Content Security Policy (CSP) configuration and lacks certain restrictive directives, which could enable an authenticated malicious user to leverage this weakness in combination with another vulnerability to inject and execute malicious scripts within the application's context. Successful exploitation may result in a low impact on confidentiality and integrity, with no impact on the availability of the application.

SAP Manufacturing Integration and Intelligence (MII) allows an attacker with high privileges to submit specially crafted input to certain affected functionality, which is processed without sufficient validation. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system, resulting in high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the application.

SAP SAPSPrint Service has memory corruption vulnerabilities in the handling of certain commands. An unauthenticated attacker could send specially crafted requests that trigger a buffer overflow in the affected component. This causes a temporary service interruption and automatic restart, resulting in low impact on availability but no impact on confidentiality and integrity.

SAP NetWeaver Application Server ABAP allows an unauthenticated attacker to exploit logical errors in DIAG protocol parsing, resulting in memory corruption. This vulnerability could potentially disclose sensitive system information or crash the system, leading to a high impact on the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the application.

tls_opt_dtls_peer_connection_id_value_get() in subsys/net/lib/sockets/sockets_tls.c, which handles getsockopt(SOL_TLS, TLS_DTLS_PEER_CID_VALUE), passed the caller-supplied optval directly to mbedtls_ssl_get_peer_cid() without verifying the buffer was at least MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_OUT_LEN_MAX (default 32) bytes. mbedtls_ssl_get_peer_cid() copies the peer-negotiated DTLS Connection ID (length 1..MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_OUT_LEN_MAX) into that buffer without a destination-size parameter, so a caller-supplied optlen smaller than the CID causes a write of up to 31 bytes past the buffer end. In CONFIG_USERSPACE builds the getsockopt syscall verifier (z_vrfy_zsock_getsockopt) bounce-buffers the user's optval into a kernel allocation of exactly optlen bytes (k_usermode_alloc_from_copy -> z_thread_malloc), so an unprivileged user thread that passes a small optlen on a connected DTLS socket with Connection ID enabled induces a kernel-heap buffer overflow, with the overflowing content being the remote peer's CID. The defect requires CONFIG_MBEDTLS_SSL_DTLS_CONNECTION_ID, an established DTLS session with a negotiated peer CID, and (for the kernel-crossing case) CONFIG_USERSPACE. Introduced when the TLS_DTLS_CID option was added (v3.5.0). The fix rejects callers whose optlen is below MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_OUT_LEN_MAX with -EINVAL.

react18-use is a React 19 use hook shim. Between 2026-05-19 01:07:01 and 2026-05-19 15:20:43, the default branch contained malicious commits 7b79148d1495a2505f9277da295a98cf176f4496 through 7b79148d1495a2505f9277da295a98cf176f4496 that executed remote attacker-controlled code on developer machines during `npm install`. The commits were removed by force-push, but local clones, forks, and direct-SHA URLs may still contain them, and `npm install` against an affected checkout will still execute the code today. The package was not published to npm. `src/install.js` was added and wired into the `postinstall` script. It fetched a JavaScript payload from an attacker-controlled HTTPS endpoint (configurable via an environment variable), disabled TLS verification, and evaluated the response as code with `require` available. Execution was deliberately skipped on CI and cloud/serverless environments, targeting developer workstations. The second-stage payload was attacker-hosted and cannot be reconstructed. Assume full compromise of anything reachable from a Node process with the user's permissions. Those who ran `npm install` against an affected checkout on a developer machine on or after 2026-05-19 01:07:01 should treat the machine as compromised, rotate every credential the machine could reach, audit account activity since 2026-05-19 01:07:01, and clean local clones.

The UpdateHub management subsystem (subsys/mgmt/updatehub/updatehub.c) drives every update operation through a single file-scope ctx structure that holds the CoAP block context, payload buffer, status code, socket, and a one-element poll-fd array fds[1]. Access to ctx was not serialized, and prepare_fds() wrote ctx.fds[ctx.nfds] and incremented ctx.nfds with no bounds check. Two independent paths mutate ctx concurrently: the background autohandler running on the system workqueue, and user-triggered operations reached through the updatehub run shell command, direct API calls, or — since the operations are exposed as syscalls — userspace threads. When a second flow enters prepare_fds() while ctx.nfds is already 1, the write lands one element past the array; by struct layout it overlaps the adjacent ctx.sock/ctx.nfds members. More broadly, the unsynchronized sharing lets two flows interleave connection setup and teardown, double-closing a socket descriptor or scribbling the shared buffers. The result is corruption of the update subsystem's internal state and denial of service of the firmware-update path; the out-of-bounds write is contained within the ctx structure and there is no demonstrated path to memory outside it or to code execution. Triggering requires a local actor able to invoke update operations (or, with CONFIG_USERSPACE, an unprivileged userspace thread) and to win a timing race against the background handler; remote peers cannot control the race timing. The fix serializes the entry points with a mutex and adds a bounds check to prepare_fds().

The UpdateHub over-the-air update client's start_coap_client() in subsys/mgmt/updatehub/updatehub.c leaks the CoAP/DTLS socket descriptor on its connection-setup failure paths. The shared error: cleanup gated socket closing on a ret > 0 flag, but ret was set to -1 immediately after the socket was created, so when zsock_setsockopt() (DTLS) or zsock_connect() subsequently failed the gate was false and cleanup_connection() was never called. The open descriptor in the global ctx.sock was then overwritten by the next attempt, permanently leaking it from the socket / net_context pool until reboot. The failing setup path is reached every time the OTA client tries to contact the UpdateHub server and the connection cannot be established — driven automatically by the periodic autohandler() poll (and on demand via the updatehub_probe()/updatehub_update() API or the updatehub run shell command). The DTLS handshake/connect outcome is influenceable by a network or on-path attacker who drops, resets, or otherwise disrupts traffic to the server, and also fails naturally whenever the server is unreachable. Each failed attempt permanently leaks one descriptor; once the shared socket pool is exhausted, networking degrades device-wide until the device is rebooted, a denial-of-service condition. Severity is low because the leak rate is bounded by the configured OTA poll interval (default once per 24 hours), the effect is gradual and recovered by reboot, and only builds with the UpdateHub client enabled are affected. There is no memory-corruption, information-disclosure, or authentication impact.

Certain web interface components in affected TP-Link Aginet devices do not validate and sanitize user-supplied input properly before passing it to system-level command execution functions.  An authenticated adjacent attacker may inject specially crafted input to execute arbitrary operation system commands with elevated privileges. Successful exploitation may allow execution of arbitrary system commands, potentially leading to full device compromise.

The affected TP-Link Aginet devices do not properly validate symbolic links created on external USB storage devices. By placing a crafted symbolic link on supported storage media, an attacker may cause the system to resolve the link. Successful exploitation may allow unauthorized read access to sensitive files within the device filesystem.

In affected TP-Link Aginet devices, use of hardcoded cryptographic keys embedded in the firmware to protect sensitive configuration data may allow an attacker who has access to device storage to recover the keys and decrypt stored data. Successful exploitation may allow access to decrypted sensitive configuration data, including credentials and service-related information.

In affected TP-Link Aginet devices, insufficient authorization validation allows authenticated low-privileged users to execute higher-privileged operations. An attacker may perform administrative actions such as creating privileged accounts or modifying critical configuration settings.

The affected TP-Link Aginet devices contain a flaw in the web management interface where authentication checks are not consistently enforced on certain endpoints. An attacker can send specially crafted requests to bypass authentication and directly invoke privileged functionality without valid credentials. This issue arises from improper enforcement of access control mechanisms on sensitive operations. Successful exploitation may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute privileged operations and gain full control of the device.